Contractor RFI & submittal tracking system
One auditable trail for RFIs, submittals, and approvals across every project and stakeholder — owned by you, with no per-seat tax and no vendor lock-in.
Why RFIs and submittals get lost in email
An RFI is only useful if it reaches the right consultant, gets answered in time, and leaves a record everyone trusts. In practice it travels through email and WhatsApp, sits unanswered in someone’s inbox, and surfaces only when a trade is already blocked. Submittals follow the same path — versions multiply, the approved revision is unclear, and when a claim arrives nobody can reconstruct who held the ball and for how long.
A custom tracking system makes the trail authoritative. Every RFI and submittal has an owner, a due date, a status, and an unbroken history — so delays are visible before they become claims, and the record is defensible. Because you own the source, you are not paying per seat for every consultant and subcontractor you add to a project, and your project data does not leave with a vendor.
What a custom RFI & submittal system covers
- RFI register — raise, route, and track RFIs with owners, due dates, ball-in-court status, and full response history.
- Submittal log — shop drawings, material approvals, and method statements with revisions, review cycles, and approval status.
- Approval matrix — your real routing and sign-off chain across contractor, consultant, and client.
- Cost & schedule links — flag RFIs and submittals that carry a variation or threaten a milestone.
- Audit trail & reporting — defensible, exportable records for claims, plus overdue and ball-in-court dashboards.
When to build, and when to run an operator
The register is your system of record — it belongs to you, because it is your evidence in a dispute. But keeping it current is largely repetitive chasing: reminding consultants of approaching due dates, escalating overdue responses, prompting subs for missing submittals. That chasing is often better run than owned, by a managed operator that pursues the responses rather than a coordinator manually working a spreadsheet of overdue items.
Blueprinted, built, handed over
We start by mapping how your projects actually run — your approval matrix, your stakeholders, the way variations and claims are evidenced today. That blueprint becomes the spec. We build against it in milestone-gated stages you can see, and we hand over the source, the schema, and the deploy pipeline so your team or any developer can extend it.
For Saudi and GCC contractors, the system is hosted in-region with an Arabic-first interface, supports the documentation standards your consultants expect, and can integrate with the scheduling and cost systems you already use.
Why build custom instead of buying a construction PM platform?
Generic platforms charge per seat across every consultant and subcontractor and impose their own routing. A custom system is built to your approval matrix and audit needs, makes the register defensible in a claim, and is owned outright — no per-seat tax, no lock-in.
Does it produce a defensible audit trail for claims?
Yes. Every RFI and submittal carries an unbroken history of who held the ball and for how long, exportable as evidence when a variation or claim arises.
Can it integrate with our scheduling and cost systems?
Yes. RFIs and submittals can link to milestones and variations, and the system can integrate with the scheduling and cost tools you already use, mapped in the blueprint.
Do we own the software?
Yes — you receive the source code, the schema, and the deploy pipeline. Your own team or any developer can extend it. There is no vendor lock-in.
Can it also chase overdue responses automatically?
That chasing is often better run than owned. The same engagement can pair the custom system with a managed operator that reminds, escalates, and follows up on overdue RFIs and submittals — see the document-chasing workflow.
We don't advise on AI. We run it for you.
Proven on your data before you commit.